You write silly childish notes in a war game. You are trying to turn this into Sim City. I suggest a real demonstration of ability. It seems to me a war with 12 on one side to 2 on the other shows lack of gerenalship on your part. Care to make it 2 on 2 and see who knows what they are doing. No, of course not, your manhood would be at stake. Care to pick a partner for Hanibel. The winners of course will be with United Front for the duration of the game and the losers will be in the game.
Joetacomiller

Two alliances there always are; a master and an apprentice.


When you can grab this land from my hand, you will be ready.

-IC
Gotham Springs.

.....is that tear in your eye?

Last I checked, this is a global attrition-based war game, not a hall for exhibition matches. I can't take the blame for your inability to harness the game's political features.

the WAAAAAAmbulance has been dispatched to deal with joetacomiller....

that is if the AWWWWMEE don't get there first...

Dear Joe,

Suck less.

"Wambulance" lolol!

I'm looking forward to this. It's going to be odd going up against you, though.

If I can take out the Joker, my mission on I-map will be complete.
-I am Batman

Your perspective is a bit skewed. Our fight isn't 12 on 2...it's 1 on 1. That is, one alliance versus one alliance. Your play in the first few days on the political front was an epic FAIL. Of the 20 people on our continent you manage to recruit 2? And its not like Pern even counts. I like to think of the United Front versus Los Generales conflict as "Band of Brothers" versus....well...."Band of Idiots" I suppose. And I don't get the comparison to Sim City since the only thing remotely similar is that both games are based upon land that is divided into squares.